Thank you for visiting WQA.org. We are making changes to improve our Web site. During this time, if you have difficulty navigating the site, please contact WQA at firstname.lastname@example.org or call 630 505 0160.
WQA experts oppose recommended water hardness at Calcium/Magnesium Symposium
Water treatment dealers might face a wave of lawsuits from an alarmed public, should the World Health Organization decide to recommend calcium and magnesium in drinking water for health purposes.
Water Quality Association (WQA) Technical Director Joseph F. Harrison, CWS-VI, PE and WQA Technical Services Consultant Regu Regunathan, PhD, both spoke at an April 24-26, 2006 Symposium on the issue. The WQA was a sponsor of the event.
The Symposium gathered experts to debate the potential benefits of consuming hard water, that is, water containing calcium and magnesium. It's been theorized that hard water consumption may potentially lower the risk of cardiovascular disease.
Whatever benefits there may or may not be, the World Health Organization (WHO) should not make such a drinking water recommendation, Harrison said. He said the benefits of consuming softened, treated water far outweigh any potential benefits of consuming hard, untreated water. Harrison also called for scientists to make a distinction between water that is naturally soft, and that, which is softened through a water treatment process.
"Naturally soft water actually leaches more contaminants from water distribution lines and plumbing systems into the drinking water supplies. Softened water does not, rather, it removes dangerous and trace level contaminants from water supplies. This major difference between these two types of waters must be taken into account,” he said.
“If users of point-of-use (POU), reverse osmosis water or desalinated water, for example, are advised that they are at risk due to calcium or magnesium deficiencies, the press and free market entrepreneurs will convince residents in naturally soft municipal water systems of the same deficiency and significant risk. Consumer perceptions in central water systems will be affected. The same advisories and policies regarding calcium and magnesium concentrations in demineralized drinking water will be applied to the major central supplies that have naturally low water hardness,” Harrison said.
He cited public water systems such as those in Boston, Massachusetts; Portland, Oregon; Tacoma, Washington; San Francisco, California; and other places as those with naturally soft water supplies.
“Any recommended guidance for drinking water hardness will immediately manifest to a broad and influential public health policy. It will affect consumer attitudes toward the safety of their drinking water supplies, and it will significantly direct expenditures of resources toward public health protection. We must insist that the highest levels of evidence be used to guide and set these policies. All of the evidence so far suggest any association between drinking water calcium and/or magnesium levels and human health are observational population studies, and relate only to naturally soft and naturally hard water. They may not pertain or apply at all to the significantly different softened or otherwise treated water supplies,” he concluded.
The information presented at the Symposium now shifts to a WHO expert committee for review. The committee is expected to make any recommendations by year-end.
For more information, see Harrison’s paper: "Why naturally soft and softened water are not the same."
Email to a Friend